The 10 percent rule

10% er's

10% er's

ArcticAmoeba said:
There is almost no O2 when the water temps comes up into the upper 50's and 60's,

AA - not sure where you heard that, but it is NOT true!! Water 50-60 degrees F has plenty of oxygen for salmonids!

ClearCreek
 
ClearCreek said:
AA - not sure where you heard that, but it is NOT true!! Water 50-60 degrees F has plenty of oxygen for salmonids!

ClearCreek


I don't think it's quite that simple. 60 degree water has almost half of the dissolved oxygen content that 38 degree water does in PPM. Now if you combine other factors including low water, warm days and increased underwater plant growth the oxygen content can decrease even further. Given the nature of our rivers here in the NW and the amount of heating it takes for the water to reach 60 degrees there normally is a substantial amount of underwater growth. I would venture to say that when our rivers reach this temperature the oxygen content is likely to be insufficient for the average salmon or steelhead as they use 4-5 times as much oxygen at 60 degrees as they do at 38.
 
Blderman said:
I don't think it's quite that simple. 60 degree water has almost half of the dissolved oxygen content that 38 degree water does in PPM. Now if you combine other factors including low water, warm days and increased underwater plant growth the oxygen content can decrease even further. Given the nature of our rivers here in the NW and the amount of heating it takes for the water to reach 60 degrees there normally is a substantial amount of underwater growth. I would venture to say that when our rivers reach this temperature the oxygen content is likely to be insufficient for the average salmon or steelhead as they use 4-5 times as much oxygen at 60 degrees as they do at 38.

Balderman:

I am not sure where you get your info either, but your statement is not true!! Water at 38F has very close to 13.3ppm oxygen, while water at 60F has very close to 10 ppm oxygen. Not even close to half as you mentioned. 10 ppm oxygen is plenty for salmonids!!

As far as the underwater plant growth, during the day those green plants ADD oxygen to the water!! And, any surface turbulence in a river will agitate the water which will also add oxygen to the water.

Just wondering - how many dissolved oxygen samples have you taken in streams or lakes??

ClearCreek
 
ClearCreek said:
Balderman:

I am not sure where you get your info either, but your statement is not true!! Water at 38F has very close to 13.3ppm oxygen, while water at 60F has very close to 10 ppm oxygen. Not even close to half as you mentioned. 10 ppm oxygen is plenty for salmonids!!

As far as the underwater plant growth, during the day those green plants ADD oxygen to the water!! And, any surface turbulence in a river will agitate the water which will also add oxygen to the water.

Just wondering - how many dissolved oxygen samples have you taken in streams or lakes??

ClearCreek

First of all, I never said my figures were 100% correct nor did I say I sampled water for a living. I think your figures for the 60 degree water are too high, more like 7-9ppm but I am not going to say you are wrong cause I don't know for sure, I was just generalizing. In regards to the plant growth I should have clarified that when the plants die they release large amounts of nitrogen into the water thus reducing the oxygen content. These blooms occur and die off several times during the summer. Secondly, yes water turbulence will add oxygen, have you ever seen the clackamas river in the summer? It loses a LOT of it's turbulence, in fact many stretches of the river become "frog water" thus reducing the oxygen content. I think all of this combined with the fact that salmon need 4-5 times the oxygen at 60 degrees than at 38 degrees means that the water temperature is definitely going to change their holding areas.

With all that said I don't know why you are being so rude with your posts. No one on here said their data was scientific, just making observations about why fish change their behavior......relax man.
 
Here is a graph that shows the dissolved oxygen at certain temperatures and a link to the article it came from. It's 11 o'clock and I'm tired and don't feel doing the conversion to F.

Why is important the oxygen dissolved in water
 
A priest a rabbi and a duck...

A priest a rabbi and a duck...

Did you hear the one about Jim and his fishing buddies? Seems the three of them had been fishing every Saturday for nearly forty years. They were at their favorite hole when a funeral procession slowly went by. Jim immediately put down his rod,stood up in the boat and put his hat over his heart. The procession lasted at least 10 minutes,Jim never flinched. When it finally passed,his buddies were in awe of him. "That was a mighty respectful thing you did there,Jim" one of them said. "Well,I was married to the woman for over forty years,I felt I owed her that much"...:D
 
Blderman said:
First of all, I never said my figures were 100% correct nor did I say I sampled water for a living. I think your figures for the 60 degree water are too high, more like 7-9ppm but I am not going to say you are wrong cause I don't know for sure, I was just generalizing. In regards to the plant growth I should have clarified that when the plants die they release large amounts of nitrogen into the water thus reducing the oxygen content. These blooms occur and die off several times during the summer. Secondly, yes water turbulence will add oxygen, have you ever seen the clackamas river in the summer? It loses a LOT of it's turbulence, in fact many stretches of the river become "frog water" thus reducing the oxygen content. I think all of this combined with the fact that salmon need 4-5 times the oxygen at 60 degrees than at 38 degrees means that the water temperature is definitely going to change their holding areas.

With all that said I don't know why you are being so rude with your posts. No one on here said their data was scientific, just making observations about why fish change their behavior......relax man.

Blderman:
Take a look at the graph that beaverfan posted. 38F is about 3.3C and 60F is a about 15.5C. The oxygen concentrations are just as I indicated.

I am not being rude, I just don't like this kind of misinformation being posted on these fishing websites. Especially when there is so much info available on the net if you take a few minutes and search for it. The graph that beaverfan posted is a great example.

Your statement that salmon need 4-5 times the oxygen when the water temperature is 60 vs. 38 does not seem logical. Could you post the data you have to show that is the case? I would like to see it. Thanks (I said thanks, that is not being rude).

ClearCreek
 
ClearCreek said:
Blderman:
Take a look at the graph that beaverfan posted. 38F is about 3.3C and 60F is a about 15.5C. The oxygen concentrations are just as I indicated.

I am not being rude, I just don't like this kind of misinformation being posted on these fishing websites. Especially when there is so much info available on the net if you take a few minutes and search for it. The graph that beaverfan posted is a great example.

Your statement that salmon need 4-5 times the oxygen when the water temperature is 60 vs. 38 does not seem logical. Could you post the data you have to show that is the case? I would like to see it. Thanks (I said thanks, that is not being rude).

ClearCreek


OK,

When I look at that chart I see 13+- PPM at 38 degrees and 8PPM at 60 degrees......So not quite half.....sorry I was 2ppm off!:shock: Ironically enough if you read the link that Beaverfan attached the chart with it states that at 77 degrees trout need 5-6 times as much oxygen as they would at 41 so my theory of 4-5 times as much at 60 degrees probably isn't too far off. Again, though I didn't see where anyone was claiming to be scientific here.....
 
Blderman said:
OK,

When I look at that chart I see 13+- PPM at 38 degrees and 8PPM at 60 degrees......So not quite half.....sorry I was 2ppm off!:shock: Ironically enough if you read the link that Beaverfan attached the chart with it states that at 77 degrees trout need 5-6 times as much oxygen as they would at 41 so my theory of 4-5 times as much at 60 degrees probably isn't too far off. Again, though I didn't see where anyone was claiming to be scientific here.....

Blderman:

I am not sure how you see 8ppm at 60 degrees F. Please take a look at the graph (of the right side, down a little) at this link:

EPA > OWOW > Monitoring and Assessing Water Quality > Volunteer Stream Monitoring: A Methods Manual > Chapter 5 > 5.2 Dissolved Oxygen and Biochemical Oxygen Demand

60 degrees F is 15.5 degrees C and the oxygen at that level is right at 10 ppm.

You said you were just 2 ppm off, well 2 ppm dissolved oxygen can make a very big difference in the health of salmonids. The difference between doing fine and a fair amount of stress!!

Claiming to be scientific or not, this is science. It is basic limnology!! While fishing may or may not be scientific, understanding some basic science as it relates to fish will make you a better fisherman.

ClearCreek
 
Raincatcher said:
Did you hear the one about Jim and his fishing buddies? Seems the three of them had been fishing every Saturday for nearly forty years. They were at their favorite hole when a funeral procession slowly went by. Jim immediately put down his rod,stood up in the boat and put his hat over his heart. The procession lasted at least 10 minutes,Jim never flinched. When it finally passed,his buddies were in awe of him. "That was a mighty respectful thing you did there,Jim" one of them said. "Well,I was married to the woman for over forty years,I felt I owed her that much"...:D

lol
 
ClearCreek said:
Blderman:

I am not sure how you see 8ppm at 60 degrees F. Please take a look at the graph (of the right side, down a little) at this link:

EPA > OWOW > Monitoring and Assessing Water Quality > Volunteer Stream Monitoring: A Methods Manual > Chapter 5 > 5.2 Dissolved Oxygen and Biochemical Oxygen Demand

60 degrees F is 15.5 degrees C and the oxygen at that level is right at 10 ppm.

You said you were just 2 ppm off, well 2 ppm dissolved oxygen can make a very big difference in the health of salmonids. The difference between doing fine and a fair amount of stress!!

Claiming to be scientific or not, this is science. It is basic limnology!! While fishing may or may not be scientific, understanding some basic science as it relates to fish will make you a better fisherman.

ClearCreek


I stand corrected, I was converting C to F incorrectly (was forgetting to multiply by 1.8). Sorry.
 
Great thread. I'm going to start Steelhead fishing this summer, this type of info will help this rook more than you know.
 
Here is some great info for this time of year.
 
Great information Jason. As the old saying goes: 'First find a river that has fish in it, then find the fish in the river'. Once know you where to look there are some basic steps that anyone can apply to dramatically improve your chances. I primarily fly fish for Steelhead and there are a number of reasons I do so but a lot of this information applies to any method.

The primary reason I use a fly rod is that you can cover a lot more water in a shorter period of time. With a fly rod you can drift through a run, lift the line (the amount of line is predicated on your casting skills) and recast, all in one motion. With a spin or bait casting setup you need to reel in the entire line before you recast. And given that you can't catch a fish when your hook isn't in the water the fly rod just improves your time in front of the fish. A Spey rod also really helps your presentation as the longer rod allows you to slow down the fly by mending large amounts of line in one shot.

Steelhead bite for entirely different reasons than a Salmon. If you find a river with fish, find the fish in the river, and deliver a fly, lure, spoon, plug, etc. in front of it them you have a VERY good chance of success. Steelhead are not that particular and serious Trout fisherman need to forget all you know about 'matching the hatch' as it doesn't apply. My rule of thumb is if you know a specific fly has caught a fish in the river you're fishing, in the same time of the year, under similar river and weather conditions, then tie it on and LEAVE IT ALONE. The biggest mistake new Steelhead fishermen make is go through every fly in the box when they're not getting hit. Trust me, if you're if you're not covering the water, presenting the fly in the right place in the water column, and at the right speed, then it won't matter what fly you have on. Once you know you're covering the water in the proper manner then start trying a few different flies.

Water temperature also makes a big difference. Ever wonder why summer fish are generally easier to catch than winter fish? The water's colder in the winter and it slows down a fishes movement which means your presentation becomes more import. A summer fish might move 5-6 feet when it sees your fly or lure but a winter might only mover a foot or so. If you do the math you'll see why better fishermen catch more fish in the winter. They know how to get something in a fish’s strike zone not near it

The last thing is how to cover water. I prefer a Spey Rod in the 12'-6" range. It's long enough to have all the spey rod benefits but can still be overhand casted if the situation warrants. I ‘m not a fan of the so called 'switch rod' and think they're nothing more than a gimmick to sell rods. With a 'switch rod' I think you end up with rod that doesn't do anything very well. Anyway, that's just my opinion. As to covering water, my approach is to first find the section of water I want to fish. I'll start at the top of the run and cast slightly upstream into the closest fishable water. I go through that 2-3 times, pull out 1 foot of line, and repeat the process until I've gone as far across the river as either I want to fish or can cast to. Sometimes I'll wade out the center of the river and work both sides, one after the other, in the same manner. Once I've covered the entire section I'll take a step or two downstream and start all over. If you follow this process you will cover all the water and if there are fish in there you should find them.

I think way too many people make way too big of a deal out of the difficulties involved with catching Steelhead. I personally think that if you follow the proper steps that it's actually easier than catching Trout or Salmon. The 90% that don’t catch fish don’t follow these basic rules. Follow Jason’s tips on finding the fish, use the tips I’ve provided, and you’ll be a 10%er in no time. It’s really not that hard.

Duane
 
One more thought...although you all have hit the mark extremely well. Steelhead, unlike salmon, eat the entire time they are in freshwater. They are hoping to make a return trip to the salt so their digestive systems do not get absorbed into their systems to make room for reproduction like a salmon who is in freshwater only to spawn and die. Therefore, steelhead will often find holding water that has the perfect conditions for insects and smaller baitfish. This is why both heads and tails of pools are so excellent. The heads have a constant flow of life tumbling out of the upstream riffle, and the tailouts have loads of perfect river rock for caddis, stones, and the little fish that eat them. The heads of pools have more cover and often steelhead can be accessed more easily without the fisherman spooking them. The tailouts have more bugs, bait, and hydrolics, but the fish are more wary in the shallower water. So sneak up on tailouts and fish them carefully. Tight lines....
 
ProfessorChromology said:
One more thought...although you all have hit the mark extremely well. Steelhead, unlike salmon, eat the entire time they are in freshwater. They are hoping to make a return trip to the salt so their digestive systems do not get absorbed into their systems to make room for reproduction like a salmon who is in freshwater only to spawn and die. Therefore, steelhead will often find holding water that has the perfect conditions for insects and smaller baitfish. This is why both heads and tails of pools are so excellent. The heads have a constant flow of life tumbling out of the upstream riffle, and the tailouts have loads of perfect river rock for caddis, stones, and the little fish that eat them. The heads of pools have more cover and often steelhead can be accessed more easily without the fisherman spooking them. The tailouts have more bugs, bait, and hydrolics, but the fish are more wary in the shallower water. So sneak up on tailouts and fish them carefully. Tight lines....

Excellent addition to this thread. If you can't move into the 10% club with all this adavice you should take up golf.
 
duanedoran said:
Excellent addition to this thread. If you can't move into the 10% club with all this adavice you should take up golf.

Thanks Dan. Ironically, even though I would likely be in the 10%, I love golf. However, I often cancel tee times for a float down the McKenzie...and NEVER cancel fishing for golf! Happy New Year!
 
It is a totally easy game where you get to place the little white ball on its own little stand then swing a long shafted, big headed club at it knowing when you connect it will go straight down the middle of a patch of freshly mowed grass. Totally easy. Like when you swing a half-hitched muddler down and across a tailout of a crystal clear Oregon steelhead stream and a nickel bright ten pound fish comes from ten feet away to eat your fly and you fight every urge to pull the fly away from this fish and he eats it and still you wait to pull back until you feel the weight of the fish....totally easy. :-)
 

Similar threads

S
Replies
15
Views
666
TheKnigit
TheKnigit
bass
Replies
0
Views
294
bass
bass
bass
Replies
0
Views
292
bass
bass
bass
Replies
0
Views
72
bass
bass
bass
Replies
2
Views
490
bass
bass
Back
Top Bottom