A
a-mac
0
I'm not sure about the life cycle of American shad, but in Indiana we have non-native gizzard shad. When I was working in Indiana for the DNR (dept. of natural resources) as a fisheries assistant we had a first had look at how devastating gizzard shad can be. In one of my final lake reports, a small lake had shad put in 4 years earlier. Sampling revealed that the bluegill fishery had collapsed (was 1/5 its size) and that no bluegill were over 6" (they were up to 10")... this was one year after shad introduction. The bass in the lake exhibited population declines and was 1/4 its original population after 4 years. However, the bass that remained were larger due to reduced population levels and food abundance. The reason why the populations of both species declined was because of direct competition with shad for zooplankton. Bass and bluegill fry were out competed by the efficiency of the shad's filter feeding mechanism. So the question exists, "why do bluegill experience stunted growth while the bass grow large?" Well, bass begin to target shad instead of bluegill. So, in this case at least, the now low bluegill numbers are actually too high for bluegill to forage due to the high shad biomass.
Keep in mind that no 2 lakes are the same. But from almost every journal I've read, gizzard shad have destroyed bluegill populations almost immediately after their introduction... in the midwest.
So yeah, this reply has nothing to do with the american shad... just a little info and a caution to keep gizzard shad out!
Keep in mind that no 2 lakes are the same. But from almost every journal I've read, gizzard shad have destroyed bluegill populations almost immediately after their introduction... in the midwest.
So yeah, this reply has nothing to do with the american shad... just a little info and a caution to keep gizzard shad out!