H
Hooked on fishin'
0
I totally agree.. as I do not have a boat my expenses are less, and I catch way more fish than I can eat. I have probably caught at least two hundred trout this year. Although, the last few trips have been a lot slower, I would still say I got my moneys worth..also I have augmented my diet with fish, as a matter of fact we are having some tonight! I would never pay 4 or 5 dollars a pound for 'bows when I can catch them. Plus it is so much better to eat your own catch. I for one will happily pay the extra so I can throw hard ware and have a bait out when fishing is slow!!GrillMaster said:I am old enough to understand the numbers game, here is how I see it. If the total cost to me for one year of angling with my 15' boat is $247.00. All that means is I must fish more to get the numbers down to an affordable level, so if I fished 67 days last year this means I must fish a minimum of 113 days next year to come out on top. So be it, it shall be done. You can make the numbers say what ever you want them to, 365 (days)divided by 247 (cost for the year) is $1.47 per day to fish in the state of Oregon with two rods; I don't buy a Salmon tag so I do save money there.
It just doesn't seem like a poor investment to me, seems very reasonable; I am not a native to this state so I see it a bit differently than most. Where I come from the cost would be quite a bit higher and the pressure would be infinitely higher. I truly love this place.
GM